Department of Computer Science

Computer Science 461

Assignment: Hardware Presentation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CATEGORY:__________________________________

Semester/Date:__________________________________

    

 T.A. Name:__________________________________

 

 

Student Name:__________________________________

 

Student Name:__________________________________

 

Student Name:__________________________________

 


 

Department of Computer Science

Computer Science 461

Assignment: Hardware Presentation

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 T.A. Name:__________________________________

The authors (named below) do hereby attest that the work submitted herein is our own and that any included material obtained from other sources has been properly noted and referenced.

 

Signature

Name

ID

Lab

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Assessment: TOTAL OUT OF ***50***

 

A = Excellent                        B = Good                  C = Average             D = Sub-Standard

 

 

A

A-

B+

B

B-

C+

C

C-

D+

D

F**

not handed in / late

50

46

42

38

34

30

25

22

17

13

6

0

 

F** = a reasonable attempt

 

 

 

 

 


Overall Comments:


Notes on Marking:

 

STRUCTURE [50%]

COMMENTS

Hard-Copy Presentation [5%]:

q       overall appearance: clean, clear

q       good use of white-space

q       length: not too long or short

q       good length: 5-10 pages

 

 

Literary Quality [5%]:

q       professional, grammatically correct

q       spelling, typos

q       clarity of writing; flows naturally

q       style and interest

q       wordiness (each word should count)

 

 

Technical Quality [15%]:

q       scenario (explained goal, point of report)

q       suitability of material (level, coverage)

q       understanding of current state of subject area

q       material in context (of the course)

q       complete?

 

 

Oral Presetnation [25%]:

q       appropriate length

q       clarity of spoken word

q       natural flow

q       visual aids appropriate

q       able to respond to questions

q       coverage acceptable

 

 


 

CONTENT [50%]

COMMENTS

Features and Shortcomings [25%]:

q       What distinguishes this category from the others?

q       What distinguishes the different kinds of devices within this category from each other?

q       What is the purpose/use for the category and for each kind (i.e. what are they good at)?

 

 

Current State-of-the-Art [25%]:

q       What kinds (not brands) of devices are currently available in this catgory ?

q       What are the typical functional specs for each kind (price (or price range; include drives and disks, etc.), capcity, speed, any other appropriate specs (such as rotation rate for disks)

 

 

 


Other Comments: